Bones dating earlier than the bible
You can read the paper here [PDF], it’s interesting, but it DOES NOT mention the Bible connection. Archaeologists Carbon-Date Camel Bones, Discover Major Discrepancy In Bible Story. Robert Harris, an Associate Professor at the Jewish Theological Seminary, says this shouldn’t come as a shock to the theological community.“While these findings may have been published recently, those of us on the inside have known the essential facts for a generation now,” Harris conveyed to Huff Post Religion through associates at JTS.(CNN) -- In the Old Testament, camels made for a very useful literary device.The bones most likely belonged to wild camels which may have lived during the Neolithic period (about 9500 BC) or even earlier.The Old Testament stories of Jacob, Joseph and Abraham mention camels.The editor of these stories knew the camel was a draft animal used in his time for traveling across the desert, so of course Abraham, Jacob and David used camels.We call it an anachronism; he projected the reality that he knew at his own time," says Ben-Yosef.
The findings suggest that camels were brought in to the southern Levant (area of ancient and modern-day Israel) perhaps by Egyptian traders.
Primarily, they represent great wealth; When Abraham journeys to Egypt, the Pharaoh offers him a huge bounty, including sheep, servants and -- the crème de la crème -- camels, in exchange for Abraham's wife, Sarah (though in fairness, the Pharaoh thought they were siblings).
Camels are used later to demonstrate Abraham's own riches (acquired later in life), and ultimately, the good heart of his future daughter-in-law, Rebecca, who is chosen after she kindly offers the beasts of burden some water.
By 3 million years ago, population of 5,000 years ago (3000 BCE).
[Source]The radiocarbon dating indicates that domesticated camels appeared “not earlier than the last third of the 10th century BCE and most probably during this time” coincident with the rise of copper smelting in the region.
He is also quick to point out that though the stories may have been written later, his findings do not necessarily cast doubt on the tales themselves.